top of page

Clarification on Place of Supply Provisions for Unregistered Persons under IGST Act, 2017

  • Priyavansh Kaushik
  • Jul 3, 2024
  • 2 min read

Updated: Nov 12, 2024

Introduction

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (‘CBIC’) has issued a new circular[i] to clarify the provisions of clause (ca) of s. 10(1) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (‘IGST Act’). The circular clarifies the determination of the place of supply of goods to unregistered persons, especially in scenarios where the billing and delivery addresses differ. The clarification follows the amendment brought by notification[ii], due to which the IGST (Amendment) Act, 2023 (31 of 2023) came into force from 01.10.2023.

Key Highlights

1. Clause (ca):

Clause (ca) was added to s. 10(1) of the IGST Act specifies that for supplies made to unregistered persons, the place of supply shall be the location as per the address recorded in the invoice. If the address is not recorded, the location of the supplier will be considered. An explanation clarifies that recording the name of the state on the invoice is deemed to be recording the address.

2. Clarification on Billing and Delivery Addresses:

The CBIC received queries about scenarios where the billing address differs from the delivery address, especially for e-commerce transactions.

For instance, if Mr. A from State X orders a mobile phone to be delivered to State Y and provides State X as the billing address, the place of supply will be the delivery address, i.e., State Y.

Suppliers can record the delivery address as the recipient’s address on the invoice to determine the place of supply.

Illustration

IGST Act, 2017

Conclusion

The circular provides a definitive framework for determining the place of supply for goods to unregistered persons, especially in e-commerce transactions. By establishing that the delivery address is the decisive location for supply, businesses can more accurately manage tax liabilities and reduce confusion in dealings with unregistered buyers. This clarity not only ensures compliance but also carries substantial economic advantages. For example, allocating tax revenues to the state where goods are delivered enhances local infrastructure and public services, ensuring that taxes contribute to regions where consumption actually occurs. Furthermore, this clarification simplifies tax calculations for businesses, significantly reducing administrative burdens and diminishing the risk of disputes over tax jurisdictions.





End Notes

[i] Circular No.209/3/2024-GST, Dated: 26.06.2024.

[ii] Notification 02/2023-Integrated Tax, Dated 29.09.2023.







Authored by Priyavansh Kaushik, Advocate at Metalegal Advocates. The views expressed are personal and do not constitute legal opinion.

Related Posts

See All

Metalegal Advocates is a litigation-based law firm based in New Delhi and Mumbai, providing litigation and advisory services in the fields of economic offences, tax (income-tax, GST, black money, VAT and other taxes), general corporate advisory, FEMA, commercial laws, and other related business and mercantile laws to businesses and individuals in a wide array of industry verticals. 

NEW DELHI

A-7, Lower Ground Floor,
Nizamuddin East,
New Delhi - 110013

F-13, First Floor,
Jangpura Extension,
New Delhi - 110014

MUMBAI

401, Trade Avenue,
Suren Road, Andheri (E),
Mumbai - 400093 

Copyright © 2021-2025. All rights reserved. Metalegal Advocates. 

  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • X
bottom of page